NikitolProject/android-encrypted-archiver
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

docs(01-01): complete format specification plan

Browse Source 
- SUMMARY.md with execution metrics and self-check
- STATE.md updated: Phase 1 complete, decisions logged
- ROADMAP.md updated: Phase 1 progress 1/1
- REQUIREMENTS.md: FMT-05 marked complete

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
NikitolProject
2026-02-24 23:24:33 +03:00
parent 1c698fec91
commit 3cb6512157
3 changed files with 135 additions and 16 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

32
.planning/STATE.md
View File

@@ -9,29 +9,29 @@ See: .planning/PROJECT.md (updated 2026-02-24)
## Current Position
Phase: 1 of 6 (Format Specification)
Plan: 0 of 1 in current phase
Status: Ready to plan
Last activity: 2026-02-24 -- Roadmap created
Phase: 1 of 6 (Format Specification) -- COMPLETE
Plan: 1 of 1 in current phase
Status: Phase 1 complete, ready for Phase 2
Last activity: 2026-02-24 -- Format specification written
Progress: [░░░░░░░░░░] 0%
Progress: [█░░░░░░░░░] 12%
## Performance Metrics
**Velocity:**
- Total plans completed: 0
- Average duration: -
- Total execution time: 0 hours
- Total plans completed: 1
- Average duration: 7 min
- Total execution time: 0.1 hours
**By Phase:**
| Phase | Plans | Total | Avg/Plan |
|-------|-------|-------|----------|
| - | - | - | - |
| 1. Format Specification | 1 | 7 min | 7 min |
**Recent Trend:**
- Last 5 plans: -
- Trend: -
- Last 5 plans: 7min
- Trend: baseline
*Updated after each plan completion*
@@ -44,6 +44,10 @@ Recent decisions affecting current work:
- Roadmap: Format spec must precede all implementation (all three decoders build against same spec)
- Roadmap: Obfuscation (XOR headers, encrypted TOC, decoy padding) deferred to Phase 6 after all decoders work without it
- Phase 1: IV stored only in TOC, not duplicated in data blocks (simplifies shell dd extraction)
- Phase 1: Same 32-byte key for AES-256-CBC and HMAC-SHA-256 in v1 (v2 will use HKDF)
- Phase 1: Magic bytes 0x00 0xEA 0x72 0x63 (leading null signals binary)
- Phase 1: HMAC scope = IV (16 bytes) || ciphertext (encrypted_size bytes)
### Pending Todos
@@ -52,11 +56,11 @@ None yet.
### Blockers/Concerns
- Open question: Does target busybox have `openssl enc -aes-256-cbc` with `-K`/`-iv` flags? (affects Phase 5)
- Open question: Is `xxd` available in target busybox? Fallback: `od` (affects Phase 5)
- Open question: Should HMAC use same key as AES or derived subkey? (must resolve in Phase 1 spec)
- Open question: Is `xxd` available in target busybox? Fallback: `od` (affects Phase 5; spec includes od fallback functions)
- RESOLVED: HMAC uses same key as AES in v1 (decided in Phase 1 spec, v2 will use HKDF)
## Session Continuity
Last session: 2026-02-24
Stopped at: Roadmap created, ready to plan Phase 1
Stopped at: Completed 01-01-PLAN.md (Format Specification)
Resume file: None